h1

My 1½ Years At LGF, Part IV: The 2 Faces Of LGF

October 20, 2007

Mr. Johnson and his website have become somewhat famous, resulting in the occasional newspaper mention, tv appearance, or radio segment.  I couldn’t help but notice that the way LGF is presented when he’s quoted by the “MSM” and interviewed by conservative radio hosts seems to be markedly different from the blog I was reading on a regular basis.  Or, to use one of Charles’ favorite terms, LGF was looking a little “whitewashed”.

For example, his Washington Post quote “The vast, vast majority of Muslims want to get along and live a comfortable life just like everyone else” is definitely a notion that I hadn’t seen volunteered on the blog, and certainly wouldn’t have gone uncriticized if I had posted a similar sentiment in the comments.  In fact, if you spend enough time reading LGF you begin to wonder things like if there’s a single Islamic organization in all of North America that isn’t a front group for the Muslim Brotherhood or connected to terrorism in some way.  But, hey, I’m not a mind-reader.

In an even more blatantly disingenuous episode, Johnson made a July 31 appearance on Dennis Prager’s show to discuss the Stanislav Shmulevich/Pace U./Koran dunking incident.  Right from the begining, he described the incident as a “horrible crime” (audio) and agreed with Prager that “no one was defending” the act.  What Johnson neglected to tell the listening audience was the fact that Stanislav had contacted LGF (?!) and was promptly given a coveted account to post on the site (user:StanS)*.  And naturally, days later, a group of lizards assembled a pro bono defense team for Mr. Shmulevich (with a blessing that would obviously be implied by a dedicated thread about it).

I just shrugged my shoulders on that one.

*I could have sworn that Charles had announced that he had granted the account on the main page, but now I can’t seem to find that little detail.  Scrubbed?  Why in the world would he do that?

Tomorrow’s topic:

Obsession With Daily Kos

Advertisements

5 comments

  1. Bingo!


  2. As far as StanS goes, most people decried the vandalism to property, but were appalled that he was being charged with a “hate crime.” This appears to be facially against the first amendment. Go read RAV v. St. Paul, and you will understand why.

    As far as the notion of Islamic organizations tied to terror; in truth, the ones that are NOT tied to terror simply do not get the press, air time, or funding as the terror-linked ones. The American Islamic Congress is pro-West and anti-terror, but I doubt you even have heard of them. In short, the most visible and well known Muslim organizations are indeed linked to terror, but of course not all are.


  3. As far as the notion of Islamic organizations tied to terror; in truth, the ones that are NOT tied to terror simply do not get the press, air time, or funding as the terror-linked ones. The American Islamic Congress is pro-West and anti-terror, but I doubt you even have heard of them. In short, the most visible and well known Muslim organizations are indeed linked to terror, but of course not all are.

    Well, I never would have known that from reading LGF, which I guess is kinda part of the point.

    And I’ll leave it up to the readers to decide how to interpret the fact that Stan decided to contact LGF and the rest of that…


  4. Bad taste what that

    By the way, what do you think about this icons site?


  5. In it something is. Earlier I thought differently, many thanks for the information.

    By the way, what do you think about this icons site?



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: